<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - linden</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/373/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>The Julie Linden saga draws to a close</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/julie-linden-saga-draws-close</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9138793/Accuser_revealed_following_defamation_lawsuit&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a recent Computerworld article&lt;/a&gt;, the mysterious Julie Linden who stalked the pages of this blog a couple of years ago was none other than the executive director of the itSMFUSA, Jim Prunty.  That pisses me off.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/julie-linden-saga-draws-close&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/julie-linden-saga-draws-close#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/linden">linden</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1669</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1669 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>itSMFUSA declares who it thinks was Julie Linden</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/680</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;This post has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/681&quot;&gt;podcast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Computerworld &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9108478&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;has revealed&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;The U.S. chapter of the IT Service Management Forum has filed a defamation lawsuit against a former executive director, alleging that he attempted to discredit and damage the organization via comments posted on a blog under a fictitious name&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Guess which blog.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/680&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/680#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/linden">linden</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/680</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 23:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">680 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>itSMF USA board election irregularities: the IT Skeptic unlocks the original posts</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/320</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;[UPDATED]&lt;br /&gt;
Now that itSMF USA has &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;articleId=9027841&amp;amp;source=NLT_PM&amp;amp;nlid=8&quot;&gt;confirmed &quot;clear evidence&quot; of voting irregularities&lt;/a&gt; in the last Board elections, I think it is time to reveal the original postings on this blog by Dr Linden, and to make a few observations.  Some readers may resent this issue taking blog space, but I feel it links in to two issues that are important to the IT Skeptic: governance of ITIL and hence ITIL&#039;s future, and the influence of vendors in an increasingly commercialised movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/320&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/320#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/linden">linden</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/320</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 03:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">320 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The little spot of bother at the itSMF USA </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/214</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The little spot of bother at the itSMF USA is &lt;a href=&quot;http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&amp;amp;taxonomyName=security&amp;amp;articleId=9022298&amp;amp;taxonomyId=17&amp;amp;intsrc=kc_top&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;in the public domain now&lt;/a&gt;.  The good news is that the Board acknowledge there might be an issue here and it bears looking into.  The bad news is they chose ITIL&#039;s big party day to do so.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/214&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/214#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/linden">linden</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/214</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 23:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">214 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A hot-potato ITIL Refresh session at upcoming bITa USA conference</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Now here is a conference session the IT Skeptic would love to attend: &quot;Can’t Speak Won’t Speak – ITILv3 &quot;!  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/167#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/linden">linden</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/32">OGC</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/30">Refresh</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/167</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">167 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
