<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - future</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/342/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Apocalyptic bullshit</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/apocalyptic-bullshit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Humans love miserable apocalyptic predictions, even when they are bullshit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lately &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-22939-w&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a report published in Nature&lt;/a&gt; did the rounds on social media with headlines like &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;Pacific plastic dump&lt;br /&gt;
garbage dump&lt;br /&gt;
more than twice the size of France&lt;br /&gt;
Dumped Plastic Defiles Nature
&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/apocalyptic-bullshit&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/apocalyptic-bullshit#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2577</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 21:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2577 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The safety razor singularity</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/safety-razor-singularity</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;You may have missed it.  We just passed through the Safety Razor Singularity, when safety razors achieved an infinite number of blades.  Given the properties of infinity, I assume that means they have achieved consciousness.  I have locked my bathroom from the outside, just to be sure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/safety-razor-singularity&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/safety-razor-singularity#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/exponential">exponential</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2302</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2013 21:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2302 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>news of IT&#039;s death is greatly exaggerated </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chicken_ITle_canstockphoto11513842.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Can Stock Photo Inc&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;67&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;I&#039;m not picking on Forrester, really I&#039;m not, &lt;strike&gt;but they keep coming out with these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle&quot;&gt;Chicken ITle&lt;/a&gt; articles declaring the demise of something or other. Last time it was the service desk,&lt;/strike&gt; [UPDATE: WRONG.  Wrong. Wrong.   Sorry no it wasn&#039;t Forrester &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/2258&quot;&gt;last time, it was Gartner&lt;/a&gt; announcing the end of service desk.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester&quot;&gt; My apologies to Forrester&lt;/a&gt;].    now it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3452322/it-department-could-disappear-by-end-of-decade-says-forrester/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the whole danged IT department&lt;/a&gt; which apparently will be gone within seven years.  Just like the previous article it is bollocks, and for the same reason: the article doesn&#039;t actually say what the sensationalist headline does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2283</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2283 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Let&#039;s not underestimate the resilience of people and societies</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lets-not-underestimate-resilience-people-and-societies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Luddites react against technology because they lack vision.  It&#039;s not their fault they can&#039;t foresee the future. Nobody can.  But in every single other technology shift, entrepreneurs found a use for idle  labour, and the efficiencies of technology meant there was new wealth to buy those new services.  Don&#039;t fear the robot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lets-not-underestimate-resilience-people-and-societies&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lets-not-underestimate-resilience-people-and-societies#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/automation">automation</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle">Chicken ITle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/robots">robots</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/watson">Watson</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2281</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 11:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2281 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Chicken ITle, robots, and a chessboard</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle-robots-and-chessboard</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chess_canstockphoto9454476.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Copyright Canstock Photo Inc&#039; style=&quot;float: left;padding-right:10px;&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;75&#039; /&gt;Today our new blog character returns.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle&quot;&gt;Chicken ITle&lt;/a&gt; draws our attention to those who announce catastrophic consequences for IT if we don&#039;t all rush off and do something. Usually these sky-falling folk are either analysts or vendors, because both profit from fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD).  But sometimes they are book authors, pumping a book.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle-robots-and-chessboard&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/chicken-itle-robots-and-chessboard#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle">Chicken ITle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/exponential">exponential</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/robots">robots</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2267</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2267 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The New IT Age</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/new-it-age</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;We have a bit of a &quot;New IT Age&quot; - or is that &quot;New Age IT&quot;? - going on.  I don&#039;t mean that like Charles Araujo&#039;s &lt;i&gt;Quantum Age of IT&lt;/i&gt;, as a major transformation of how we do IT.  I mean it in the same way as &quot;New Age&quot; thinking: i.e. a total abdication of rational or critical thought. Peace, love, dope, and brown rice ... and bad science.  We haven&#039;t seen crystal IT or aromatherapy IT or holistic pyramid IT, but some days I feel as if it is just a matter of time.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://clicktotweet.com/93Z0h&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; style=&quot;color:red&quot;&gt;Tweet this&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/new-it-age&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/new-it-age#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/jobs">jobs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/kurzweil">Kurzweil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/robots">robots</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/systems">systems</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2201</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 04:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2201 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>On exponential systems</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/exponential-systems</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is hard to extrapolate what is going to happen from any set of data.  One thing is for sure: in the real world, any simple model that shows a continuing increase will run into a real physical limit.  And if it is an exponentially increasing curve that we are forecasting, that limit is going to come sooner rather than later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/exponential-systems&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/exponential-systems#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/exponential">exponential</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/systems">systems</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2229</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 03:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2229 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How prescient is Ray Kurzweil and how useful are his predictions?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-prescient-ray-kurzweil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Even a blind squirrel finds a few nuts.  But Ray Kurzweil missed the Cloud, Facebook, Twitter, SaaS, phone apps, and Angry Birds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-prescient-ray-kurzweil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-prescient-ray-kurzweil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/exponential">exponential</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/kurzweil">Kurzweil</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/115">Swami</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2212</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 00:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2212 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
