<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Capita</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/336/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Some thoughts on the Capita JV </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/some-thoughts-capita-jv</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;As many readers will know, The UK Government and a British outsourcer called Capita have formed a joint venture (JV) to own and sell the whole &quot;Swirl&quot; best-practice portfolio, which includes ITIL and PRINCE2.  The company (which remains nameless) exists from 1st July, and will be fully operational from 1st January 2014.  This is the end-game (end of days, some would say) of a journey to commercialise these frameworks that started with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/219&quot;&gt;the mysterious disappearing 1.1.1&lt;/a&gt; five years ago.  OGC &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/one-reason-why-ogc-has-make-some-serious-money-out&quot;&gt;was run by two of the highest-paid civil servants&lt;/a&gt; in Britain: you don&#039;t put highly-paid execs into a tiny backwater like OGC unless it is to return a profit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Having met Peter Hepworth (JV CEO) and Chris Barrett (&quot;opening batsman&quot;, read: running PR interference until the JV gets a formal PR voice of its own) at the SDI13 conference in Birmingham, I thought it was time to write down a few thoughts I have over the JV.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/some-thoughts-capita-jv&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/some-thoughts-capita-jv#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2289</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 01:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2289 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two new heads</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/two-new-heads</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;No that isn&#039;t a reference to a hillbilly&#039;s baby.  We&#039;ve seen two announcements this past week of people heading up organisations owning major bodies of knowledge: the Capita ITIL-PRINCE2 JV, and ISACA.  Somewhat of a contrast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/two-new-heads&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/two-new-heads#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/60">ISACA</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2285</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2285 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The future of ITIL and PRINCE2</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil-and-prince2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The Capita/UK Govt JV is having a planning session on 23rd May.   This is your opportunity to suggest agenda items.  Don&#039;t mess about with paragraph numbering or translating into Bulgarian.  Here&#039;s what I suggested.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil-and-prince2&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil-and-prince2#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2278</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2278 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>How do we feel about ITIL being a commercial product?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-do-we-feel-about-itil-being-commercial-product</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL has been sold (and Prince2 - the following discussion applies just as much to all of the &quot;Swirl&quot; products sold).   It is a commercial product.  No more half-way house with OGC outsourcing publishing and accreditation: they&#039;ve gone the whole hog and flogged the Swirl suite off for the corporate shilling.  (First example of this in the UK Government apparently and supposedly a model for more.)  How do we feel about this new situation?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-do-we-feel-about-itil-being-commercial-product&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/how-do-we-feel-about-itil-being-commercial-product#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/28">itSMF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/141">MOF</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2276</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 00:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2276 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>A bulletin from the castle</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bulletin-castle</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-prince2-capita-and-cabinet-office-dark&quot;&gt;wrote last week&lt;/a&gt; about how we are in the dark over the new joint venture between her Majesty&#039;s UK Government and Capita owning the &quot;Swirl portfolio&quot;: ITIL, Prince2 and assorted other IP products.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.best-management-practice.com/gempdf/Best_Management_Practice_eBulletin_Issue_01.pdf&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A bulletin &lt;/a&gt;&lt;small&gt;(pdf)&lt;/small&gt; has fluttered down from the castle wall today.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bulletin-castle&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/bulletin-castle#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/cabinet-office">Cabinet Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2273</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 21:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2273 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL, Prince2, Capita and the Cabinet Office - in the dark</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-prince2-capita-and-cabinet-office-dark</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Lots of people are asking what the IT Skeptic makes of the recent announcement of a joint venture between the Cabinet Office and Capita to exploit the Best Practice Library.  They&#039;re asking why I haven&#039;t made any comment yet.  Two reasons:  (1) I was off-grid for 10 days and (2) we haven&#039;t been given any information useful enough to draw many conclusions.  Clearly the behaviour I call &quot;Castle ITIL&quot; will continue: you will be informed when they are good and ready to announce by decree, and until then the castle gates remain firmly shut.  But I have been able to glean a few things...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-prince2-capita-and-cabinet-office-dark&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-prince2-capita-and-cabinet-office-dark#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/cabinet-office">Cabinet Office</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/capita">Capita</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2272</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2013 05:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2272 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
