<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Forrester</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>My apologies to Forrester</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chick_in_egg_canstockphoto11513840.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Copyright Canstock Photo Inc&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;65&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;Oops, sorry.  I &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated&quot;&gt; accused Forrester of&lt;/a&gt; repeatedly doing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/chicken-itle&quot;&gt;Chicken ITle&lt;/a&gt; articles, when in fact only the latest one was by Forrester and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/2258&quot;&gt;previous instance&lt;/a&gt; - on Service Desk - was  Gartner &lt;i&gt;Killing the Help Desk Softly - or Blowing It Up&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle">Chicken ITle</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2290</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2013 23:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2290 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>news of IT&#039;s death is greatly exaggerated </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/chicken_ITle_canstockphoto11513842.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Can Stock Photo Inc&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;67&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;I&#039;m not picking on Forrester, really I&#039;m not, &lt;strike&gt;but they keep coming out with these &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/chicken-itle&quot;&gt;Chicken ITle&lt;/a&gt; articles declaring the demise of something or other. Last time it was the service desk,&lt;/strike&gt; [UPDATE: WRONG.  Wrong. Wrong.   Sorry no it wasn&#039;t Forrester &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/2258&quot;&gt;last time, it was Gartner&lt;/a&gt; announcing the end of service desk.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/my-apologies-forrester&quot;&gt; My apologies to Forrester&lt;/a&gt;].    now it is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/it-business/3452322/it-department-could-disappear-by-end-of-decade-says-forrester/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;the whole danged IT department&lt;/a&gt; which apparently will be gone within seven years.  Just like the previous article it is bollocks, and for the same reason: the article doesn&#039;t actually say what the sensationalist headline does.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/news-its-death-greatly-exaggerated#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/future">future</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2283</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:12:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2283 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why are the analysts dumping IT Service Desk</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I heard it first on &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/ServiceSphere&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;@ServiceSphere&#039;s tweets&lt;/a&gt;.   The analysts are losing interest in IT Service Desk tools.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/why-are-analysts-dumping-it-service-desk#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/223">gartner</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2021</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2021 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dev needs to understand what Ops is for</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/dev-needs-understand-what-ops</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.forrester.com/mike_gualtieri/11-02-07-i_dont_want_devops_i_want_noops&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;A recent blog post made me angry&lt;/a&gt;.  This is one cause of the Dev-Ops divide: ignorance of what the other side does.  I expect some of that in the trade, down at the coalface amongst Dev and Ops practitioners.  I don&#039;t expect it from Forrester analysts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/dev-needs-understand-what-ops&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/dev-needs-understand-what-ops#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/analysts">analysts</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2006</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2006 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EasyVista HIGH danger Crap Factoid alert</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/easyvista-high-danger-crap-factoid-alert</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;inline inline-left&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imageskeptic/chokey.preview.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; title=&quot;&quot;  class=&quot;image image-preview&quot; width=&quot;200&quot; height=&quot;152&quot; /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Chokey the Chimp issues a HIGH &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/crap&quot;&gt;Crap Factoid&lt;/a&gt; danger alert for the EasyVista claim of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.staffandline.com/index.php/assessing-your-itsm-maturity-level/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;a stunning 271 percent ROI over three years with payback within 12 months &quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  Stunning indeed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/easyvista-high-danger-crap-factoid-alert&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/easyvista-high-danger-crap-factoid-alert#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/crap">Crap Factoid</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/226">EasyVista</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/249">Forrester</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/1965</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 03:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1965 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
