<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/1/0</link>
 <description>The IT Infrastructure Library  </description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I can&#039;t get excited about ITIL4</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/i-cant-get-excited-about-itil4</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just can&#039;t get excited about ITIL4. No, you didn&#039;t miss any blog posts: I haven&#039;t written anything yet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/i-cant-get-excited-about-itil4&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/i-cant-get-excited-about-itil4#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2630</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2019 22:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2630 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lessons the world took from ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;ITIL aspires to be customer-centric.  If only the reality matched the aspiration. If only the main lesson people took away from ITIL was customer value.  In practice I think the world takes away quite different lessons.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is a bunch of awful fallacies that the world &lt;b&gt;&lt;u&gt;actually&lt;/u&gt;&lt;/b&gt; took from ITIL:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/lessons-world-took-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/234">agile</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/kamu">Kamu</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/261">lean</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2576</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2018 19:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2576 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL processes aren&#039;t processes</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-processes-arent-processes</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Stuart Rance &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.optimalservicemanagement.com/blog/we-need-fewer-itsm-processes/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt; called out ITIL&#039;s dirty secret&lt;/a&gt;: they&#039;re not really processes.  Stuart talks about how some things that ITIL calls a process are not a process. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-processes-arent-processes&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-processes-arent-processes#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/112">process</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2574</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2018 21:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2574 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The future of ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Forecasting is hard, especially about the future.  Nevertheless here are some thoughts on the future of ITIL: it is not going away but it is on a trajectory of gradually decreasing significance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/future-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2551</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2017 06:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2551 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>why DevOps transformations succeed where ITSM so often doesn&#039;t</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-devops-transformations-succeed-where-itsm-so-often-doesnt</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve consulted on many ITSM initiatives and it always seemd a struggle to effect improvement: all stick and no carrot; dragging horses to the river with no interest in drinking.  My DevOps consulting these days is a different experience - of happy horses following willingly and drinking their fill.  The difference between ITIL and DevOps is that DevOps works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-devops-transformations-succeed-where-itsm-so-often-doesnt&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/why-devops-transformations-succeed-where-itsm-so-often-doesnt#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/153">change</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/118">ITSM</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2539</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2539 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL exam market continues to shrink</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exam-market-continues-shrink</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It&#039;s not as if too many people really care anymore, but the ITIL market appears to continue to shrink.&lt;br /&gt;
I haven&#039;t kept an eye on the numbers for a while - having more important things to think about these days with DevOps - but a comment on this blog triggered me to go look again.  Yup, still falling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exam-market-continues-shrink&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exam-market-continues-shrink#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/240">peoplecert</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2523</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2523 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DevOps and ITIL are both ITSM</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-and-itil-are-both-itsm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;DevOps and ITIL are both ITSM.  The patterns are the same though the execution is different.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-and-itil-are-both-itsm&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-and-itil-are-both-itsm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2478</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 08:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2478 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Service catalogue and request catalogue</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-catalogue-and-request-catalogue</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;It is hard to believe that confusion between service catalogue and request catalogue is still a thing but it is, as shown by &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.facebook.com/groups/back2itsm/permalink/989745247745869/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;a recent conversation on Facebook Back2ITSM&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-catalogue-and-request-catalogue&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/service-catalogue-and-request-catalogue#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/122">catalogue</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/182">request</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2490</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2016 10:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2490 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>An interesting tale of ITIL trademarks</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/interesting-tale-itil-trademarks</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Here is an interesting story of the use of the ITIL name....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://itil.technorealism.org/&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Read this link first.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I take these lessons from this:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;1) Lawyers are incapable of subtlety or nuance&lt;/b&gt;, or even thinking much.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;2) Build an open content website and they won&#039;t come.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/interesting-tale-itil-trademarks&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/interesting-tale-itil-trademarks#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/252">trademark</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2461</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2015 03:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2461 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Copyright issues when using ITIL at the coalface </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Axelos are shooting themselves in the foot by constraining consultants&#039; use of ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/copyright-issues-when-using-itil-coalface#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/21">CobiT</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/126">copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2438</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2015 10:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2438 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Axelos selling ITIL?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-selling-itil</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The IT Skeptic has seen paperwork today that appears to confirm big news for ITIL.  Yes folks, we believe Axelos has sold ITIL® to a consortium of independent ITSM consultants.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-selling-itil&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-selling-itil#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/april-fool">April Fool</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2451</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2015 06:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2451 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Axelos Consulting Partner (ACP) Programme</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-consulting-partner-acp-programme</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Axelos recently announced their &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axelos.com/becoming-an-axelos-partner/axelos-consulting-partners&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Axelos Consulting Partner (ACP) Programme&lt;/a&gt; to licence ... er I mean &quot;formally recognize [sic]&quot; consulting organisations practicing in all areas of Axelos &quot;global best practice&quot; including ITIL and PRINCE2.  They&#039;re putting the squeeze on.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-consulting-partner-acp-programme&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-consulting-partner-acp-programme#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/204">consulting</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2450</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2015 09:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2450 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Axelos announces a new level of ITIL certification: Practitioner</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-announces-new-level-itil-certification-practitioner</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;After my dark forebodings about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-squeeze-2015&quot;&gt;a potential squeeze on ITIL in 2015&lt;/a&gt;, Axelos&#039; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.axelos.com/qualifications/itil/itil-practitioner-level&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;first(?) ITIL announcement of the year&lt;/a&gt; seems a good idea: yet another level of ITIl certification, the Practitioner.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-announces-new-level-itil-certification-practitioner&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-announces-new-level-itil-certification-practitioner#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2443</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2015 22:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2443 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>the ITIL Squeeze in 2015</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-squeeze-2015</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/squeeze_canstockphoto2641776.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;© Copyright CanstockPhoto.com&#039; style=&quot;float: right&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;100&#039; height=&#039;75&#039; /&gt;AXELOS are doing a few troubling things lately, that may or may not point to an ITIL Squeeze in 2015 as AXELOS seek to capitalise on their purchase of ITIL (and the rest of the Best Practice por&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-squeeze-2015&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-squeeze-2015#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/166">PRINCE2</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/squeeze">Squeeze</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2432</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2015 20:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2432 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Axelos are dropping ITIL complementary certifications</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-are-dropping-itil-complementary-certifications</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&#039;http://www.itskeptic.org/files/itskeptic/imagepicker/1/thumbs/sir_axealot_canstockphoto6811067.jpg&#039; alt=&#039;Image&#039; style=&quot;float: left;margin-right:3em&quot; class=&#039;imgp_img&#039; width=&#039;80&#039; height=&#039;100&#039; /&gt;The creeping squeeze: Axelos will no longer recognise Complementary certifications for ITIL qualifications.  I can&#039;t see anything positive for the ITIL community in this.  In fact the only interpretation I can imagine is an attempt by Axelos to weaken competition.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-are-dropping-itil-complementary-certifications&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/axelos-are-dropping-itil-complementary-certifications#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/axelos">Axelos</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2419</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 23:28:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2419 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL exams have fallen 11% in the last year</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exams-have-fallen-11-last-year</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://axelos.gtml2.com/pv_obj_cache/pv_obj_id_2FB43A81DFEA77E48BC1A351B161DC744CF20200&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Axelos numbers for the first half of 2014&lt;/a&gt;, ITIL exams worldwide have fallen 11% compared to the first half of 2013.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exams-have-fallen-11-last-year&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-exams-have-fallen-11-last-year#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/48">certification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2402</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2402 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What is the best ITIL service desk tool?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-best-itil-service-desk-tool</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m surprised that folk can say &quot;X is the best&quot; when they have no idea of someone&#039;s requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you evaluate a tool based on features, you&#039;re doing it wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-best-itil-service-desk-tool&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/what-best-itil-service-desk-tool#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/taxonomy/term/17">service desk</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/tools">tools</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2394</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2014 21:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2394 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DevOps following in ITIL&#039;s footsteps</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-following-itils-footsteps</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Listening to the DevOps world (I am immersing, or at least paddling) it sounds so exactly like the ITIL experience that I am literally laughing out loud:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-following-itils-footsteps&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/devops-following-itils-footsteps#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/devops">devops</category>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2383</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2014 23:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2383 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ITIL v3 - what standard is this based on?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-v3-what-standard-based</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Somebody asked me this question recently: ITIL v3 - what standard is this based on?  I thought I&#039;d share (and extend) my reply here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no standard for ITIL, at any version.  ITIL is not based on any standard.  No organisation can be certified as compliant with ITIL.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-v3-what-standard-based&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/itil-v3-what-standard-based#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2370</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2370 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>no such thing as ITIL consultants</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/no-such-thing-itil-consultants</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Nailed it.The Practitioner’s Dilemma: How to Adapt ITIL &lt;a href=&quot;http://itsmtransition.com/2014/07/how-to-adapt-itil/&quot; title=&quot;http://itsmtransition.com/2014/07/how-to-adapt-itil/&quot;&gt;http://itsmtransition.com/2014/07/how-to-adapt-itil/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The magic happens when practitioners become expert at adapting best practices to solve their organization’s challenges.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well yes.  That&#039;s been true of consulting forever. ITIL only ran off the rails when supposed experts lost sight of that ﻿&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.itskeptic.org/content/no-such-thing-itil-consultants#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.itskeptic.org/topic/itil">ITIL</category>
 <wfw:commentRss>http://www.itskeptic.org/crss/node/2382</wfw:commentRss>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2382 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
