<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;What ARE Microsoft up to?  Patents on RSS, CMDB, IT operations...  Can they get away with this?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/85</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;What ARE Microsoft up to?  Patents on RSS, CMDB, IT operations...  Can they get away with this?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Maybe everyone should thank</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/85#comment-385</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe everyone should thank Microsoft? With a Microsoft fence around RSS the cutting edge players will be looking over the horizon the next advancement. Onward!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Dec 2006 06:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Ziggi</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 385 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Not good</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/85#comment-377</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe Microsoft has a new business model: &lt;strong&gt;sue&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://bink.nu/Article9160.bink&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;Microsoft filed suit against Alcatel-Lucent in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, claiming the French company is infringing on 10 of its patents involving future methods for transmitting combined voice and data messages.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree more than ever with your original post.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 25 Dec 2006 02:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 377 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>to establish their own history as a defensive legal tactic</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/85#comment-375</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So it&#039;s just to show their own &quot;prior art&quot;?  to establish their own history as a defensive legal tactic?  Makes sense...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All those who trust Microsoft not to complete the patent claim and then use it against their competitors say &quot;aye&quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 375 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Covering themselves</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/85#comment-374</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft is just trying to cover themselves. They would prefer not to get sued if someone else gets a RSS patent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you never ask, she&#039;ll never say yes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(Fill in better metaphor here)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scott&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 23 Dec 2006 13:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 374 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
