<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Nobody refers to Evaluation process in any other process.&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/512</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Nobody refers to Evaluation process in any other process.&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>I think they should</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/512#comment-2494</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;If the books were coordinated they should refer to other processes. This, like the comment on Application Management process is a minor thing alone but my point is that it looks like that there was no serious attempt to coordinate the five books.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>aroos</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2494 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should they?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/512#comment-2472</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Should they?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 08:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2472 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
