<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Visions of the Future of ITIL: the IT Swami&amp;amp;#039;s Seventh and Final Vision&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/359</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Visions of the Future of ITIL: the IT Swami&#039;s Seventh and Final Vision&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Thanks, I am eagerly awaiting it ;-) and ...</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/359#comment-1735</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the discussion link. Using that I could add another two to the above list:&lt;br /&gt;
- there is almost a war over who is the original inventor of the contents&lt;br /&gt;
- every responsible in management will listen to the gorillas and get a tool with &quot;built-in processes&quot; (saves them from thinking for themselves, a fool with a tool ...)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mbuzina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1735 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>This also deserves a blog post </title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/359#comment-1732</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;OOh you leave good comments.   This &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itskeptic.org/node/29#comment-1718&quot;&gt;also&lt;/a&gt; deserves a blog post in response.   Please be patient though, I have a mighty backlog right now :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1732 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Predictions - Are we riding a dead horse? Or is it just limping?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/359#comment-1727</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So far we have learned from the swami and the skeptic:&lt;br /&gt;
- ITIL covers only one third of the service management&lt;br /&gt;
- it is torn to pieces by gorillas&lt;br /&gt;
- it&#039;s onwer is unwilling to lead or rule&lt;br /&gt;
- it&#039;s advocates are using it to dig for as much gold as possible (forgetting the long term return)&lt;br /&gt;
- the new books may teach us how to run, but first many organisations have to realise that they have feet to stand on&lt;br /&gt;
- training companies are ignoring the customers needs and are milking the market for highest returns (25 participants in one course!)&lt;br /&gt;
- the books are expensive and do not even contain all that has been promised&lt;br /&gt;
- connection to other frameworks and BOKs are not incoporated for real&lt;br /&gt;
- the organisation that could bind people and businesses to ITIL is not goverened well and it&#039;s purpose is far from being focused on being benefitial for its members.&lt;br /&gt;
- others I may have forgotten.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On the other side I see a lot of enthusiastic and very knowledgable people around that know when to &quot;ignore&quot; best practice and how to implement thorough, practical and working service management structures (including the 3 pillars of the chair!).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What will be stronger? I for myself see a very prominant danger that ITIL will be forgotten and ignored by the more important business than the &quot;ITIL business&quot;. I do hear a tendancy with many of my customers that they do not need or want a &quot;theory of all&quot;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What is the feedback you are getting?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>mbuzina</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1727 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
