<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;New itSMF newsletter - boon or burden?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/new-itsmf-newsletter-boon-or-burden</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;New itSMF newsletter - boon or burden?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Publishing Norms</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/new-itsmf-newsletter-boon-or-burden#comment-7062</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Skeptic - as a publisher I am not sure your question re makes sense in standard publishing concerns. Of course the ITIL books aren&#039;t standard in any way which doesn&#039;t help. If I understood how the translations worked, who is actually publishing them, who is translating them, who owns the copyright in the translations etc, I might be able to give you some idea of what is &quot;normal&quot; but again these aren&#039;t normal in any way.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Puiblisher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 7062 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
