<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Public review of the ITIL V3 Foundation Syllabus: who knew?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Public review of the ITIL V3 Foundation Syllabus: who knew?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Not enough time or too much content....</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3777</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Liz&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope Skep can find my original blogs on this circa May 2007... the ITIL V3 Foundation syllabus started out too big and remains too big.  The exam is too small.  The increase in hours does not address (yet) self-study and accredited elearning criteria and albeit welcome still short of the 4 days I recommended way back.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I agree wholeheartedly with your Bridge comment.  One day is ludicrous and makes about as much sense as the singer of the same name.  I also recommend they not bother and sit a V3 full class....  and to back all this up I actually analyzed the scope of the V2 and V3 syllabii with startling results.... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In my train-the trainer instructor guides I point out:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;V2 syllabus was @ 600 pages, 120 figures, 29 tables... containing 11 subject areas - 18 hrs&lt;br /&gt;
V3 has 1120+ pages, 377 figures (Strategy has as many as V2!), and 130+ tables... oh and 35 subject areas.... 16 hrs 15 mins - now 18hrs... &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Can they do math?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I stand by my prediction of last earlier this year - these classes and many other components will go online and be available from the &#039;official source&#039; - TSO as soon as they can figure out how to handle a worldwide market... if you are an accredited trainer or training organization ask them what they are up to including elearning in all syllabi... all.... without notice and as a late addendum....&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skep - how do I link to other blog articles on your website?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 07:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>ianclayton</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3777 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>More time wlcome</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3771</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I agree - I hated teaching Foundation Bridge, as I felt that because it was basically a cramming session, they would forget as quickly as they learnt. I just wonder if the market will support a 2 day course - I would advise people that a full V3 foundation would be better value if they can afford the time.&lt;br /&gt;
Liz Gallacher&lt;br /&gt;
Freelance Trainer and Consultant&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 12:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Liz Gallacher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3771 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Output from V3 Foundation and Foundation bridge Review released</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3770</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Having trained both V3 Foundation and Bridge, I find these recommendations most welcome. The current syllabus simply doesn&#039;t leave much time for discussion and explanations. Another thing is how this will affect the popularity of the courses as they will, besides having higher cost, take more time from the students. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Erkki Viitanen&lt;br /&gt;
Senior Consultant, ITSM&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Erkki</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3770 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Output from V3 Foundation and Foundation bridge Review released</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3769</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I have just received a document from ISEB.&lt;br /&gt;
&quot;A summarized version of the survey results will be made available on the Accreditor website http://www.itilofficialsite.com&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As far as I can see, the major recommended changes are&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation&lt;br /&gt;
• The depth and breadth of the Syllabus to be adjusted to take account of the survey feedback.&lt;br /&gt;
• Increase Total Contact Hours (excl. Exam 18 hours).&lt;br /&gt;
The improved syllabus will be made available to all ATOs by 17th December 2008 with the sample papers being made available early in the New Year.&lt;br /&gt;
Foundation bridge&lt;br /&gt;
• Adjust learning hours within the syllabus to ensure that delegates have the same V3 level of&lt;br /&gt;
understanding as they would get from the Full Foundation Course.&lt;br /&gt;
• Increase Total Contact Hours (excl. Exam 9.5 hours).&lt;br /&gt;
So that makes it impossible to do in 1 day, increasing the cost.&lt;br /&gt;
Liz Gallacher&lt;br /&gt;
Freelance Trainer and Consultant&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Liz Gallacher</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3769 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Still time</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3563</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Go &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi-forum.org/forum12/474.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;to the forum link&lt;/a&gt; and scroll down (the forum doesn&#039;t seem to have anchored links).  &quot;If you have missed the opportunity to comment on either the v3 Foundation or Foundation Bridge syllabus, you may do so here until Friday, 26th September.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 20:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3563 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Check Again, Surveys are closed</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3562</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Maybe APMG does not understand how calendars work, but the surveys are closed.  And the site says input was due by end of business Sept 17.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Me thinks this may skew the results&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Visitor</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3562 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>QUICK if you want to comment on ITIL V3 Foundations</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3556</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...you can do it &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.itsmfi-forum.org/forum12/474.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;here until September 26th&lt;/a&gt;, though obviously not anonymously&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3556 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Love it</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3550</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I love it.  Quite apropos really.  Prescient even :-D&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 08:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3550 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>typing error?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/public-review-itil-v3-foundation-syllabus-who-knew#comment-3549</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Skep,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The typing error on the official site is funny: &quot;a wide rage (!) of stakeholders&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 06:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Michiel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3549 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
