<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.itskeptic.org"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>The IT Skeptic - Comments for &quot;Do we have to do ITIL to do Service Management?&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Do we have to do ITIL to do Service Management?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Use multiple BOKs</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-3528</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;By combining some of these through research, it is surprising how much they agree on the order in which to tackle service management practitioner domains. There is definite agreement among many of them how to methodically rollout a new ITSM program. It is valuable to use multiple.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 15:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Jim F</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3528 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>nobody has heard of all this crap but they&#039;ve heard about ITIL</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-3527</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I think we are agreeing here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Too many initiatives start with ITIL as a solution and go looking for a problem.  the choice of BOK should come up after we have defined objectives, approach, problem ... and looked at the size and wealth of the organisation, amongst other things.  THEN we look around for a BOK, or occasionally BOKS, that will give us a head start.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s the theory.  As you say, the practice in most cases is that nobody has heard of all this other crap but they&#039;ve heard about ITIL.  A good consultant in favourable conditions on a lucky day might sell a more appropriate solution.  If i can get some people to ask the question some of the time I&#039;ve made progress.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 10:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3527 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Are you serious ?</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-3526</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Come on Skep, you don&#039;t really believe this. Who really wants to use more than one BOK ? And who would risk to go against ITIL ? No one&#039;s ever been sacked for implementing the industry standard. I strongly believe the risk of a failure is the same whatever BOK you choose. You say &quot;Take a look at what best suits your business&quot;. I say focus on your project, not on the BOK selection. More often than not BOKs are just a good way to sell change to people who don&#039;t want to change.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Philippe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3526 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ah yes, I came across that</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-360</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Ah yes, I came across that recently.  Thanks for that&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 20:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 360 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ASL, the &quot;ITIL for Application Management&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-359</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Thought it might be of interest to point out the existence of ASL - the Application Services Library. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ASL is the &quot;ITIL for Application Management&quot;, an approach in the public domain, supported by the ASL Foundation. It addresses in depth the specific AM issues (like maintenance) that ITIL - including ITIL AM - just skirts around and is welcomed, particularly by the apps community, as a logical addition to ITIL. ITIL v3 will include ASL as one of the Global Standards with which ITIL interacts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You can find additional information including about a hundred best practises that have been selected from contributions by various organisations (although more in Dutch than in English) on www.aslfoundation.org (select English).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 19:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Mark Smalley</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 359 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Done</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-3</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I made some additions.  Thanks for that.&lt;br /&gt;
Charlie, if you register with this site you can get email notifcations of new posts :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 03:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>skeptic</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 3 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Wikipedia IT Service management</title>
 <link>http://www.itskeptic.org/node/10#comment-2</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I just updated the Wikipedia IT Service Management definition - and THEN saw this article. Kind of scary; we&#039;re quite on the same page I think. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Would appreciate your adding to my initial attempt!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 22:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Charlie Betz</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 2 at http://www.itskeptic.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
